TJSP 12/11/2021 / Doc. / 2890 / Caderno 4 - Judicial - 1ª Instância - Interior - Parte I / Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo
Disponibilização: sexta-feira, 12 de novembro de 2021
Diário da Justiça Eletrônico - Caderno Judicial - 1ª Instância - Interior - Parte I
São Paulo, Ano XV - Edição 3398
2890
Code of Criminal Process, of the crimes described in article 33, caput, and article 35, both from Law 11.343/06, in the form of
article 69 from the Penal Code. It is to be issued a release license in favor of Darren Lawson. Regardless of the final judgement,
I determine the devolution of his passport and authorize his return to his origin country. Also, I judge the request to CONDEMN
the accused Diego Furtado Guimarães to the fulfillment of penalty involving deprivation of liberty, in the amount of 05 (five) years
of seclusion and the payment of 500 (five hundred) daily fines, by the infringement against article 33, caput, from the Law
11.343/06, and 03 (three) years of seclusion with the payment of 700 (seven hundred) daily fines, by the infringement against
article 35, caput, from Law 11.343/06. The penalties must be added up, following the procedure described in article 69 of the
Penal Code. I also CONDEMN the accused Silvano Meireles e Diógenes Cortijo Costa Júnior to the fulfillment of penalty involving
deprivation of liberty, in the amount of 05 (five) years and 10 (ten) months of seclusion and the payment of 583 (five hundred and
eighty three) daily fines, by the infringement against article 33, caput, from the Law 11.343/06, and 03 (three) years and 06 (six)
months of seclusion and the payment of 816 (eight hundred and sixteen) daily fines, by the infringement against article 35, caput,
from Law 11.343/06. The penalties must be added up, following the procedure described in article 69 of the Penal Code. The
daily fines will be worth the legal minimum. I determine the closed regime for the beginning of the sentence serviment, by the
quantum (amount) of penalty that was applied, the circumstances of the crime and the amount of medication that were
commercialized and apprehended during the police approach. By the same reasons, the accused Silvano e Diógenes will not be
able to appeal in freedom, so the circumstances that gave reason to the measured will remain the same. About the matter, the
Supreme Tribunal of Justice has already manifested its opinion, saying: About the principal of the presumption of innocence, the
accused that remained justifiably arrested during all the criminal instruction, will have no right to appeal in freedom (RHC nº
23.319 MG, Rel. Min. Laurita Vaz, j. 12/08/2008). The accused Diego will be able to appeal in freedom, seeing that he answered
to the process while in freedom, without any new circumstances that imply the need of a new analysis of his custody. For the
three condemned, the substitution from a penalty involving deprivation of liberty to a penalty that restricts rights is impossible,
seeing that the requirements established in article 44 of the Penal Code were not fulfilled. For the accused Silvano e Diógenes, I
cease to apply the detraction, seeing that it goes against the constitucional principal of the natural judge, a subject that would be
of exclusive competence to the Judgement of Execution, not to the judge that applies the sentence. In that matter, it has been
decided: Criminal Appeal - Increased Theft - Condemnatory Sentence - The absolvition being intended, or alternatively, the
removal of the assembly of agents of the crime and the use of firearms, that causes an increase, the slowing down of the
prisional regime and the detraction of the time established for the prevented arrest - Inadmissibility - Materiality, authorship and
majority points sufficiently demonstrated - The word of the victim is of extreme importance in the clarification of the facts and the
identification of the criminal - Testimony of the police officers is valuable and in accordance with the other evidences Condemnation well edited, based on a solid and convincing set of evidence - Penalties maintained - A regime fixated with no
faults - Impossibility of detraction - The granting of a more beneficial regime calls for an analysis of the subjective requirements
as well - Subject attributed to the Judgement of the Executions. The appeal is not received. Rapporteur: Moreira da Silva,
District: São Paulo, Assessing organ: 13ª Camera of Criminal Law, Date of the judgement: 17/12/2015, Date of record:
29/12/2015). I emphasise that the detraction is about the anticipated progression of the penalty, differencing itself of article 387,
paragraph 2°, of the Code of Criminal Process, which determines that the time of temporary arrest be considered for the fixation
of the initial regime. I highlight that the amount of temporary penalty that is fulfilled is insufficient to alter the initial regime, being
determined for the fixation of the regime, in this case, the gravity of the crime and the judicial circumstances unfavored that go
against the accused. The accused are to be recommended in the prison where they are found. By the terms of article 92 of the
Penal Code, I declare the loss of the work post of the accused Diógenes. I declare the loss of the values apprehended in favor of
the Union. About the vehicles apprehended with the means to protect third parties with good faith, the interested must prove their
property of the object, describing its form of acquisition and in case of payment of benefits, describing the lawful origin of the
value that is destined to the payment of the benefits. With the final judgment, I authorize the destruction of the medication that
was apprehended, as well as the launching of the accused’s names in the list of the guilty. Custas ex lege. P.R.I.C. - ADV:
CESAR RENATO FLORINDO (OAB 405260/SP), JESUÉ HIPOLITO FERNANDES (OAB 154733/RJ), RODRIGO HIPOLITO
FERNANDES (OAB 371413/SP), JOSE TAVARES PAIS FILHO (OAB 60658/SP), REGINALDO MARCO HERNANDES (OAB
241451/SP), ROGÉRIO BATISTA GABBELINI (OAB 176163/SP), MARIANA CORTIJO COSTA (OAB 407637/SP)
Processo 1502424-82.2019.8.26.0548 - Ação Penal - Procedimento Ordinário - Roubo - J.P. - E.S.R.J. e outro - Arbitro
honorários à Advogada nomeada para patrocinar a defesa do réu Emerson Santos Rodrigues de Jesus, Dra. Ana Lúcia de
Souza, expedindo-se certidão. Após, cumpra-se o determinado à pág. 965 e arquivem-se os autos, fazendo-se as anotações
e comunicações necessárias. Int. Campinas, 09 de novembro de 2021. - ADV: KARINA AMORIM TEBEXRENI TUFOLO (OAB
268964/SP), ANA LÚCIA DE SOUZA (OAB 207272/SP)
Processo 1505169-42.2020.8.26.0114 - Ação Penal - Procedimento Ordinário - Roubo - PATRICK DA COSTA NOGUEIRA
- - CAIO GUILHERME DA SILVA MORAES - - MATHEUS LUCAS PAIVA COSTA - 1- Encaminhe-se cópia do Mandado de Prisão
expedido em desfavor do acusado Matheus Lucas Paiva Costa, devidamente cumprido, ao IIRGDaunt, para atualização de
seu prontuário. 2- Págs. 460/462 e 470 Anote-se. 3- Tendo em vista a citação pessoal do acusado Matheus Lucas Paiva Costa
(pág. 466), revogo a suspensão do processo (artigo 366 CPP). Façam-se as anotações e comunicações de praxe. Intime-se
o Dr. Defensor do acusado para apresentação de defesa prévia, por escrito, no prazo de dez (10) dias, nos termos da Lei nº
11.719/2008. 4- Em razão de haver sido constatado junto ao CDP Hortolândia, estabelecimento prisional em que o réu Matheus
Lucas Paiva Costa está recolhido, de que não há sala disponível para realização da audiência no dia e horário anteriormente
agendados, qual seja, 17/11/2021, às 14:30 horas, inviável a manutenção da data designada, pelo que determino o cancelamento
e a liberação da pauta, inclusive dos outros estabelecimentos prisionais. Por ora, aguarde-se a apresentação da defesa prévia
para posterior designação de data. Recolham-se os mandados expedidos, se o caso, bem como intime-se sobre o cancelamento
da audiência. Comunique-se os estabelecimentos prisionais, bem como o superior hierárquico das testemunhas policiais, acerca
da desnecessidade de apresentação dos réus e dos policiais na audiência anteriormente agendada. Int. Campinas, 10 de
novembro de 2021. - ADV: RAFAEL DE AZEVEDO (OAB 436932/SP), CARLOS HENRIQUE CARDOSO PEREIRA (OAB 80371/
SP)
Processo 1507721-43.2021.8.26.0114 - Inquérito Policial - Apropriação indébita - “SERGIO” e outros - APARECIDA DE
FÁTIMA SOARES DOS SANTOS VIAN e outro - Milena Duarte - Págs. 74/82: trata-se de requerimento formulado por Milena
Duarte Ferreira pleiteando a liberação do veículo FIAT /PUNTO ELX 1.4, ANO DE FABRICAÇÃO 2008, ANO MODELO 2008,
SL/1400CC, PARTICULAR, COR CINZA, PLACAS EAY6456, CHASSI 9BD11812181023947, RENAVAN 00952512475. Juntou
documentos (págs. 83/228). Em análise ao Inquérito Policial, tem-se que Elieser Vian e Aparecida de Fátima Soares dos Santos
Vian, então proprietários do veículo acima descrito, por meio de instrumento contratual (págs. 08/10), celebraram contrato de
consignação em 12 de março de 2021 com MOOVECAR LTDA. Em 18 de março de 2021, Milena, ora requerente, celebrou
contrato de compra e venda (págs. 100/101), tendo por objeto o mesmo veículo objeto dos autos, realizando o pagamento
Publicação Oficial do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo - Lei Federal nº 11.419/06, art. 4º